Press "Enter" to skip to content

Court imposes N10.1m fine against Immigration over wrongful eviction of official

The Nationwide Industrial Courtroom in Abuja has imposed an even of N10.1 million on the Nigerian Immigration Service NIS as a penalty for the utilization of vulgar power to evict one among its senior officials, Daniel Makolo, from his good quarters.

Justice Oyejoju Oyebiola Oyewumi, in a judgment, ordered the Immigration carrier to pay the sum to Makolo as compensatory damages for its unlawful and barbaric behavior in opposition to the good.

The judgment, delivered on February 16, a copy of which used to be sighted on Sunday by our correspondent, used to be in a suit marked: NICN/ABJ/395/2020 filed by Makolo.

Sued alongside the NIS are the Comptroller Favorite of Immigration, Muhammad Babandede (now retired); Deputy Comptroller Favorite (Human Handy resource Administration), Musa Yahaya Dauda; Comptroller (Service Welfare), Mrs. Inyang Iniobong Ime; Chief Superintendent (the Provost Marshal/Chief Security Officer), Umoh Aloysious Jerome; Superintendent, Hands Squad Unit (Rapid Response Squad – RRS), Adamu Mohammed Azare, and Deputy Superintendent, Hands Squad Unit, U. S. Obeweh.

Justice Oyewumi learned that the NIS and other defendants resorted to self-support in evicting Makolo, who used to be restful in carrier, when armed officials of the NIS in 2017 invaded his quarters, in his absence, pulled down doorways to the property and went away alongside with his belongings.

The resolve pushed apart the defendants’ counterclaims on the grounds that they failed to exhibit their claim that Makolo used to be now not entitled to the wage he earned from the month he used to be forcefully evicted until he used to be purportedly eased out of carrier in 2018, a resolution he is for the time being considerable in court docket.

Justice Oyewumi stated: “This court docket is now not going to lend its screech to the act of self-support and power feeble by the defendants.

“The resort to self-support and exercise of power by the defendants in evicting the claimant with out an show of court docket thereby illegally striking off the properties of the claimant makes them liable in damages for the breaking down of the door of the rental and elimination of the claimant’s properties.

“It’s indispensable to exhibit that the claimant used to be restful within the make exercise of of the first defendant (NIS) when he used to be forcefully evicted from the govtquarters in 2017, come before he used to be pushed apart by the defendants in 2018.

“One then wonders why the first defendant deployed power and self-support in evicting the claimant. I need to equally remark here that the 48hours label given to the claimant by the defendant to vacate the Workers quarters is unreasonable and inadequate for a workforce who in response to them has been posted to Borno Express with out every other prior label.

“I obtain from the total irregular facts and instances of this case that the defendants’ circulation used to be unreasonable, arbitrary and barbaric.

“Thus, the defendants are liable in damages for the stated circulation. Reliefs 1, 2 and 3 be triumphant to the extent that. The defendants are accountable for resorting to self-support and power within the eviction of the claimant. I obtain and befriend.

“The court docket has reasoned hereinbefore in this judgment that the claimant is entitled to damages for forceful coming into arbitrary and barbaric resort to self-support by the defendants in evicting the claimant from his rental. It is within the sunshine of this that I award the sum of N10, 000,000.00 ideal, as damages to the claimant in opposition to the first defendant.

“The claimant, having succeeded in most aspects of his claim and never misconducted himself whereas conducting his case, is entitled to the designate. Therefore, it is within the exercise of my discretion that I award the sum of N100,000.00 as designate to the claimant. I so award,” the resolve stated.

In dismissing the defendants’ counter-claims, the resolve stated: “The law locations a generous burden on the defendants to define and keep their claims, failing which the court docket can now not grant the similar.

“It is in see of lack of proof of the reliefs sought by the defendants/counter-claimants that I befriend that their counter-claims fail in its entirety and are thus pushed apart.

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *